Expression of Interest (EoI) for undertaking a
consultancy assignment for ‘Repositioning of NABARD’
The National
Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), set up on 12 July 1982 as
a Development Bank by an Act of the Indian Parliament, is the apex institution
in the country for providing and regulating credit and other facilities for the
promotion and development of agriculture, small-scale industries, cottage and
village industries, handicrafts and other rural crafts and other allied economic
activities in rural areas with a view to promoting integrated rural development
and securing prosperity of rural areas, and for matters connected therewith or
incidental thereto. The Bank, headquartered in Mumbai, has a pan-India presence
thru’ Regional Offices at all State Capitals and around 400 District Offices,
having staff strength of nearly 5000, comprising professionals and support staff.
A. Need
for Repositioning
On completion of its 25th year, the Bank undertook a self-assessment of its performance vis-à-vis
the mandate and the emerging requirements of its operating environment. A view
emerged that NABARD had very largely met its expectations during the past 25 years
and had pioneered many initiatives like the SHG-Bank Linkage Programme, Natural
Resource Management, Kisan Credit Card, etc. It was also felt that growth of the
rural economy comprising agriculture and non-land based SMEs and businesses would
continue to be critical, as over 60% of the workforce depends on it. In order
to enhance the impact of its functioning, especially in distressed and resource-poor
regions, the Bank should not only redesign and re-engineer its product range and
work processes for the current set of operations using appropriate technology
platform but also foray into new business areas, offer new products using different
delivery mechanisms, and forge new partnerships with institutions in the public,
private and voluntary sectors enabling them to leverage funds for development
initiatives. The financial sector reforms, especially those taking place in the
cooperative sector, would also require NABARD to factor business risks in its
operations more effectively. Such initiatives would also require organisational
restructuring, capacity building of its human resources as well as additional
financial resources. A comprehensive strategy is therefore called for to accomplish
the above.
B. Objective of the Assignment:
‘To
prepare a strategic action plan relevant for
furthering the objectives as mandated in the NABARD Act, 1981 and to assist NABARD
in rolling out the first year’s plan.’
C. Deliverables
The
deliverables of the assignment include, but are not limited, to the following:
1.
Business Process Re-engineering, Product Development and Resource Mobilisation:
i.
Assess the strengths of NABARD’s operations in terms of present activities and
propose future growth pattern;
ii. Propose re-engineering of
the existing work processes of the Bank relating to investment credit, production
credit, micro-finance, infrastructure funding and developmental areas for enhancing
their efficacy;
iii. Improve the product mix in current operations
to enhance its impact in reducing imbalances in spatial and regional spread;iv.
Assess the present set of development activities and integrate new activities
to catalyse credit flow to critical areas and sectors;v. Design
new products for direct finance, co-finance, refinance, infrastructure and support
strategies
- to evolve new partnerships in
private and cooperative sectors
- to design action plans for NABARD’s direct
finance subsidiaries
- to synergise development and business interventions
vi. Estimate the resource requirements
for the proposed set of activities and suggest a suitable resource mobilization
and investment plan;
vii. Review NABARD’s risk management system
and make recommendations to bring it in line with the new business initiatives
and best practices;
viii. Propose a methodology for assessing
new product offerings and suggest additional products directly or through subsidiaries
with a high likelihood of success ;ix. Suggest measures for
upscaling consultancy services of NABCONS &x.
Design roadmap for the next 5 years, field test and handhold rolling out of first
year plan.
2. Human Resource Development
- Outline the resource requirement in terms of new
skills, knowledge, etc. to achieve 1 above, assess the presently available human
resources and design a suitable intervention for HRD.
3.
Re-designing Organisational Structure
- Design
a suitable organizational structure including subsidiaries - Position and Department
identification;
- Defining authority, responsibility and accountability
attached to the positions;
- Suggest HR Management policies and strategies &
- Assess Organizational governance, with emphasis on e-governance
4.
Leveraging Information Technology
- Dovetailing
the Bank’s IT architecture with the emerging requirements
D. Indicative
Timelines for the Assignment
The entire assignment
is expected to be completed within a period of 18 months from the date of commencement,
covering the following two phases:
Phase I: Start up
Phase – 3 months
Phase II: Design, Rollout and Implementation Phase – 15 months
Note: Rolling out certain ‘Quick Win’ initiatives would
be taken up simultaneously with Phase I indicated above and completed within 6
months.
The assignment shall be executed at the Head Office
of the Bank at Mumbai and other offices/units of NABARD, across the country.
E. Exit
Clause
Once the objectives spelt out under the above
phases are realised within the time frame indicated, the assignment shall be treated
as complete and the contract ceases to exist.
F. Eligibility
Criteria
G. Evaluation
Matrix (for shortlisting consulting agencies
for issuing RFP)
Sl.
No. |
Criteria |
Weightage (%) |
Max. Marks |
1 |
Past Experience of the firm |
40 |
|
40 |
a |
No. of years experience in India
– 1 mark for every 5 years of experience |
|
10 |
4 |
b |
No. of assignments undertaken for
organization restructuring, product development and process reengineering from
1999-2000 onwards |
|
20 |
8 |
| |
Only Report preparation (25%) – 1
mark for every two assignments |
|
|
2 |
| |
Full Implementation with handholding
(75%) – 1 mark for every assignment |
|
|
6 |
c |
Of (b) above, No. of assignments
having a direct impact on rural economy |
|
20 |
8 |
| |
Only Report preparation (25%) – 1
mark for every two assignments |
|
|
2 |
| |
Full Implementation with handholding
(75%) – 2 marks for every assignment |
|
|
6 |
d |
No. of completed / on-going assignments
in India in the last 5 years (with reference to (c) above) |
|
40 |
16 |
| |
Only Report preparation (25%) – 1
mark for every two assignments |
|
|
4 |
| |
Full Implementation with handholding
(75%) – 2 marks for every assignment |
|
|
12 |
e |
No. of assignments undertaken outside
India, the learnings of which could be applied to the present assignment – 1
mark for every assignment/country |
|
10 |
4 |
2 |
Experience of key personnel |
20 |
|
20 |
a |
Qualifications relevant to scope
of the assignment - 4 marks for own staff and 2 marks for external experts |
|
30 |
6 |
b |
Experience relevant to 1(d) (in terms
of man-months deployed) – 2 marks for every 40 man-months of full implementation
and handholding assignments completed. |
|
70 |
14 |
3 |
Methodology & plan for implementation |
30 |
|
30 |
a |
Timeliness of the plan-effective
use of available time |
|
20 |
6 |
b |
Clarity in meeting the objectives
and methodology |
|
40 |
12 |
c |
Objectivity in plans and methodology,
quality of the resources proposed to be deployed |
|
20 |
6 |
d |
Controls and evaluation suggested
in methodology |
|
20 |
6 |
4 |
Financial strength of the consultancy
firms |
10 |
|
10 |
a |
i. Turnover fig. for the last three
financial years (2006-07 upto 2008-09)
a. in aggregate (25%)
– 1 mark for every year with > Rs. 50 crore
b.
for consulting assignments involving organisational restructuring / repositioning
(75%) – 2 marks for every year with > Rs. 5 crore |
|
80 |
2
6 |
b |
ii. Net profit fig. for the last
three financial years (2006-07 upto 2008-09) – 1 mark for Rs. 10 crore and
above p.a. |
|
20 |
2 |
Note: (i) For criteria at S. No. 3 above, the Evaluation Committee indicated at Para
H (c) below will evaluate the capabilities and award the marks, based on the EoI
document.
(ii) As regards S. No. 1 (c), the Evaluation Committee’s
assessment regarding the impact of the project on rural economy would be final.
H. Evaluation
Process
- The
consulting agencies shall have to fulfill the eligibility criteria as indicated
in Para F above in full, failing which they would be rejected outright.
- The
evaluation of consulting agencies (fulfilling the eligibility criteria) shall
be based on the parameters spelt out in the Evaluation Matrix indicated above.
- The Bank will constitute
an Evaluation Committee for evaluation of the proposals (as spelt out in b above)
and to decide on short listing of the agencies. The consulting agencies may be
required to make a presentation before the Evaluation
Committee, if considered necessary. The consulting agencies
would be given 10 days’ notice to enable them to make the necessary preparations
in this regard. The first five agencies, in descending order of merit,
so evaluated, will be short-listed for issuance of RFP. The decision of this Evaluation
Committee and the Bank will be final and the Consulting
Agencies will have no right to challenge the decision of the Bank. The short listed
agencies will be provided with the RFP for further evaluation and selection of
the Consulting Agency for undertaking the assignment.
I. Other Instructions to Consulting
Agencies
a. The
Bank reserves the right to shortlist the consulting agencies, based on the requirement
of the Bank and consider them for the next stage of evaluation.
b. Interested
consulting agencies are requested to submit their EoI as per the prescribed format
given in Annexure A. Documentary proof must be submitted for all claims made by
the consulting agencies. The EoI, in the prescribed format on company letter-head,
must be submitted in a sealed cover super-scribed ‘EoI Document for Repositioning
of NABARD’ and HAND-DELIVERED on any working day of NABARD Head
Office at Mumbai (Monday to Friday – 10 AM to 4 PM) upto and including
29 May 2009 at the following address:
The Managing
Director
NABARD Head Office, 7th Floor A Wing
C-24, G Block,
Bandra-Kurla Complex
Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400 051
All
clarifications relating to the assignment shall be available only by way of email (nabrepo@nabard.org and nabrepo@gmail.com)
The last date/time for submission of EoI response is 4 PM on 29 May 2009.
c. EoI
responses eceived after this time and date will NOT be entertained
under any circumstances. In case of the designated last day being declared a public
holiday, the same will be extended to the next working day.
d. Responses
sent through any mode other than hand delivery will NOT be accepted.
e. The Bank reserves the right to accept/reject any or all
offers submitted in response to this advertisement without assigning any reason
whatsoever.
f. The EoI responses will be opened at 1100
hrs. on 02 June 2009 at the above address. The representatives of the consulting
agencies are welcome to be present for the opening of the EoI. No separate
intimation will be given in this regard to the agencies.
g. The
Bank reserves the right to issue Request For Proposal (RFP) to such of those consulting
firms it deems eligible and qualified, based on the responses received, the requirements
of the Bank and short-listed as per the above evaluation process.
Please
Note: This is not a Request For Proposal (RFP) and commercials should not be submitted
with the EoI response. Any EoI response received with commercials will be rejected
summarily.
h. The consultancy agency, finally selected
to execute the assignment, would be required to position a dedicated team on-location
during the entire course of the assignment. The team may comprise a minimum of
5 members (excluding the Team Leader) who are on the rolls of the agency, having
the relevant qualification and experience for the assignment.
i. This
EoI request supersedes all earlier communication or information (if any) provided
either directly or thru’ NABARD’s website. Hence, EoI responses to this request
and advertisement only will be considered.
Annexure
A
Format for submission of EoI
The
EoI should be submitted in as per the following format:
Part
I: Company Information
- Name
- Type:(Partnership
Firm/Company – Public, Private, Govt. Owned/ Trust/ Others – please specify)
- Date
of Incorporation and Year of commencing operations in India
- Corporate
Office Address (in India)
- Local Office Address (in Mumbai)
- Website
- Principal
Contact [Name, Address, Tel. No. (incl. mobile no.), Fax, e-Mail]
Eligibility
Criteria-related Information
The Consulting
Agency to satisfy the parameters stipulated under Eligibility Criteria in full
and also furnish appropriate documents satisfying the said criteria.
Part
II: Operational Details
(a) Experience
of the firm:
(i) No. of years experience in India;
(ii)
No. of assignments undertaken for organization restructuring, product development
and process reengineering, from 1999-2000 onwards -
(a)
Only Report preparation
(b) Implementation (viz., knowledge partnership with
the client) – Please indicate period of implementation.
(iii)
Of (ii) above, No. of assignments having a direct relation to rural economy:
(a)
Only Report preparation
(b) Implementation – Please indicate period of implementation.
(Pl.
furnish break-up of assignments handled for Public Sector Banks, PSUs, DFIs &
Government agencies separately for (ii) and (iii) above).
(iv)
Details of assignments (with reference to (iii) above) undertaken in the last
5 years, beginning 2004-05 (in the following format):
- Client Name
- Address
of the Client
- Client Reference (Name, Designation, Contact Tel. No.)
- Project
Title
- Project Scope (in brief)
- Project Duration (months)
- Manpower
deployed (man-months)
- Project Location(s)
- Status of the Project
(completed/on-going)
(v)
No. of assignments handled outside India in the last 5 years, beginning 2004-05,
the learnings of which could be applied to the present assignment. [Please give
details in the format indicated at (iv) above].
(b) Experience
of key personnel
(i)
Experience and Qualifications relevant to scope of the assignment (in organizational
restructuring, HR, Finance, IT & Strategic consulting, etc.) – Indicate No.
of Personnel available within the firm and indicating explicitly those who are
external to the firm, but whose expertise would be utilized by the firm for this
project.
Sl.
No. |
Areas
of Expertise |
No.
of staff * |
Of
(c), No. of staff likely to be identified for working on the proposed assignment |
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
(d) |
1 |
Strategy & Organisation Development |
|
|
2 |
Banking and Finance |
|
|
3 |
Marketing |
|
|
4 |
ACA/AICWA/ACS |
|
|
5 |
Risk & Insurance Management |
|
|
6 |
Systems Management |
|
|
7 |
Human Resources Development |
|
|
8 |
Agricultural Sciences |
|
|
9 |
Agricultural Business Mgmt./Rural Mgmt. |
|
|
10 |
Social Work, Rural Development |
|
|
11 |
Law |
|
|
* Note:
(i)
Preferred qualification is Post Graduation or equivalent. However, the agencies
can also include and separately mention any other but relevant qualification.
(ii)
Pl. indicate no. of staff available for each area of expertise with experience
separately.
(iii) Specifically describe the experience relevant to the above
qualification
(iv) Also indicate experience relevant to a (ii) and a (iii)
(v)
No. of in-house skilled personnel at the place of execution of work
(c) Financial
strength of the consultancy firm (2006-07 to 2008-09)
(i) Turnover
figures for the last three financial years<
a) In aggregateb)
For consulting assignments involving organizational restructuring/ repositioning
(ii) Net Profit figures for the last three financial years.
Part
III: Methodology and Plan for Implementation
The
Consulting firm to submit a step-by-step implementation methodology, which depicts
the firm’s approach to fulfill the scope of the work envisaged in the assignment.
This should, inter alia, cover the timelines for the various activities,
clarity in meeting the objectives and methodology, objectivity in plans, quality
of resources proposed to be deployed during implementation, the deliverables envisaged
at various stages and the control and evaluation mechanism suggested.
Consulting
firms must showcase any value addition, innovation or technology advancement/integration
which it proposes and which it feels will help the Bank to have both tangible
and intangible benefits from implementing the assignment.
download 79 KB
|