Nabard Logo Top Navigation Image
About NABARD I Role and Functions I Subsidiaries
I Associates
I CIRCULARS I Model Bankable Projects I Chairman's Speeches
Index Contact SubscribeDatabank
 
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
 Strategy  
 Self Help Groups  
 Capacity Building  
 NABARD's Support  
 Innovative Projects  
 mF Institutions  
 MFDEF  
 mF Conference  
 SHG Linkage Progress  
  Financial Assistance & Lending Practices of MFIs as Capital Support and RFA to MFIs  
   

microFinance

   
   
 

Assessment Methods

 
ASSESSING A SELF HELP GROUP
 
( Note for guidance)
 
[The norms for SHGs in a particular place may have to be developed keeping in view the local conditions. The above pattern is only a model and indicative one and could be used as the basis for developing suitable norms for financing SHGs be it banks or any other financing institution. A few proactive commercial banks, Regional Rural Banks and Cooperative Banks have already introduced their own norms and the same is being followed by the financing units.].
 
[This note may be read with NABARD circular letter dated February 2000, which also shares different formats for appraising a SHG for finance].
 
For any financing institution, appraisal is very important for ensuring the utility of the loan and repayment of the loan. Bankers generally appraise the project and the borrower. In case of SHG financing, most of the project appraisal norms like  assessing the cost benefit and profits will not be workable due to the peculiarities of SHG financing. For considering a loan application for financing the Financer has to evaluate the capacity and character of the prospective borrower. SHG’s also being   customers have to be appraised before extending credit facilities. But then assessment of creditworthiness of a SHG is very different from that of an individual. SHGs are not to be assessed in terms of their ability to provide collateral or guarantees of net worth. The SHGs have to be assessed in terms of Group dynamics like cohesion, vibrancy, goal-oriented action, participation of members, democratic decision and collective leadership. The appraiser has to see whether the group is functioning, actually as a group, why the members have come together, whether it is for obtaining loan from bank or the group sees other purposes, what is the group discipline and whether it is sustainable.
 
The basic principles on which the SHGs function are:
 
i The members of the groups should be residents of the same area and must have an affinity. Homogeneity of relationship could be in terms of caste/occupation/gender or economic status (which is critical).
   
ii Savings first, credit thereafter
   
iii SHGs should hold regular meetings
   
vi SHGs should maintain record of financial and other transactions
   
v They should have norms regarding membership, meetings etc.
   
iv Group leaders should be elected by members and rotated periodically
   
vii Transparency in operations of the group and participatory decision making
   
viii Rates of interest on loans should be decided by the group
   
ix Group liability and peer pressure to act as substitutes for traditional collateral.
   
For assessing a Self Help Group the important aspects that a financer should look into include;
   
1 Norms for functioning :
   
The SHG should have developed some kind of norms for its functioning the norms should be covering major areas of its functioning as well as the decision making processes, leadership etc., Norms generally relate to
   
a Membership
   
b Meetings - time, periodicity
   
c Savings - amount, periodicity, rate of interest (return)
   
d Credit - procedure for sanction, ceiling amount, purposes, rate of interest to be charged, repayment period etc.
   
e Fines - in case of default in attending meetings, savings and credit repayment. Group may also levy fines for any deviant behavior etc.
   
f Leadership - election or nomination of leaders, rotation of leaders etc.
   
g Personal/social improvement - minimum literacy level to be achieved, social work to be done etc.
   
The above norms may be written or oral. They may be decided in the initial meetings or they may evolve over a period of time depending upon the need of the group. The important aspect to be looked into are :
   
How norms evolved, whether by the consensus of the whole group.
   
Whether the members are aware of the norms (even if they are oral) and understand them,
   
Whether the norms are implemented.
   
2 Meetings
   
The group decides the periodicity of the meetings i.e., weekly, fortnightly or monthly. They also decide on the time of the meeting. Decision on time and periodicity helps in regular conduct of meetings. The regularity in the holding of the meeting and the attendance during meeting gives an indication bout groups functioning. Therefore a Financer should see whether.
   
The meetings have been held regularly
   
The attendance in the meetings
   
The members are punctual and stay till the end of the meeting
   
Are there any sanctions for the delinquent members ?
   
The Financier can use his observations during the meetings and the meeting register to get data on this appraisal aspect.
   
3. Maintenance of Books
   
 

Whether group is maintaining the basic books that will give details of its functioning and accounts of the group is an important criterion to be judged. The books should give the details of number of meetings held, decisions taken in the meetings, amount of savings of the members and credit availed, the total savings of the group and repayments. Who maintains these books is another important criteria for judging the group. Do members maintain it, if not are they making efforts to achieve basic numeracy or literacy so that they can start doing it themselves.

   
  Financer has to verify :
   
Whether details of meetings, proceedings, and attendance are maintained.
   
Whether member-wise record of saving and credit are maintained.
   
Whether the records are upto date.
   
Whether all members are kept informed of their savings and credit balances from time to time.
   
In case of illiterate groups whether what is the system followed, does the group verify the books maintained by NGO/outsider.
   
Whether systems have been developed to ensure safe custody of cash.
  go to top
4.  Leadership
   
  Two or three group members are elected as leaders/ book-writers. Initially the opinion leaders may be the leaders and over a period of time they are expected to be take turns. The group leaders are expected to a) regularly convene and conduct the meetings, b) help the group members in taking decisions, c) resolve conflicts, d) maintain books of account and e) approach bank branch for operation of accounts.
   
The aspects that are to be seen are :
   
Whether the leaders have been elected and rotated
   
Whether they help in democratic functioning of the group
   
Whether there is a conscious attempt to groom other members to take up leadership
   
Are they marginalising the benefits (especially loans)
   
5 Participation and Awareness of Group Members
   
  Are the Members aware of the purpose of group formation, the operations and activities of the group viz. The savings and the credit of the group as well as the individual member’s savings and credit details.
   
Do they  participate in group discussions and decision making
   
Do they help solve the problem that are raised in the meetings
   
Do they work cohesively and have transparent dealings
   
  The democratic character of the group may be judged by attending one or two meetings and talking to individual members.  The awareness level of members helps in healthy functioning of the group and resolution of conflicts within the group.
   
6. Savings :
   
  The group decides on the amount of savings as also its periodicity. It has to be seen whether the saving, as decided upon, is regularly made, how the defaults are dealt with and whether the system is modified as per the requirements of the members.
   
7. Credit :
   

The following aspects to be looked into while assessing the credit function of the group :

   
The decision making process of selecting loanees.
   
The system followed in assessing credit requirement of individual members and the amount to be sanctioned.
   
The system of monitoring the credit.
   
The repayment performance of members and incidence of defaults besides the effectiveness to deal with such defaults; whether the concept of `peer pressure’ is working.
   
12.  Self Reliance of the Group
   
  Can the group function on its own without the support of the NGO is an important criterion for assessment? The level of dependency on the NGO/promoter of the group and impact of withdrawal of NGO/promoter on the group is to be assessed.
   
  RATING OF SELF HELP GROUPS
   
 

SL.NO

CATEGORY

CRITERIA

MARK

KEY

1

COMPOSITION

Membership is homogeneous

No homogeneity in membership

10

5

The rating is based on the judgment of assessing official

2

AGE OF THE GROUP

One year and above

Six months and above but less than a year

10

5

There is no need to evaluate an SHG if it is less than six month old (ignore marginal shortfalls upto 1 month)

3

WEEKLY GROUP MEETINGS

Four meetings per month

2-3 meetings per month

1 meeting per month

10

8

5

The total number of meetings conducted during the last 3 months may be divided by 3 to arrive at average no. Of group meetings.

4

ATTENDANCE

More than 90%

Between 70% and 90%

Less than 70%

10

5

3

See explanation 1 at the end.

5

MINUTES BOOK

Written in detail

Maintained, but not in detail

10

5

Peruse of minutes book pertaining to meetings held during the last 3 months.

6

PARTICIPATION IN GROUP DISCUSSION

Participation by only a few members

Participation by majority of members

5



10

Peruse minutes book (if rating is 10 for item 5)

Observe during a couple of group meeting

Interact with members

7

SAVINGS (FREQUENCY)

4 times a month ( by majority members)

4 times a month (but not by majority)

2-3 times a month (by majority members)

2-3 times a month (but not by majority)

1 time a month day (by majority members)

1 time a month (but not by majority)

10


8



8


5


3

 
1

Step 1   : Take the average no. Of members making saving during last 3 months.

Step 2 : Compare this with the total no. Of members

Step 3    : Majority mean > 60%

Step 4   : For average no. Of meeting, follow rating given for item 3 above.

 

Note : Please see explanation 2 at the end.

 

8

SAVINGS & LOAN RECOVERY

(MODE OF COLLECTION)

Collected in group meetings

House - to house collection

10

5

Ascertain form group leaders and members in this regard also, peruse minutes book.

9

STYLE OF FUNCTIONING AND GROUP DECISIONS

Democratic and Transparent

Decisions taken by few dominant member / members / group leaders

10


0

Peruse minutes book, Interact with members, Observe in few group meetings, Ascertain whether periodical elections are conducted for the leadership and whether all decisions are in group meetings and on democratic lines.

10

SANCTION AND DISBURSEMENT OF LOANS

Selection of borrowers in group meetings

Sanction and disbursement of loans in group meetings

Loan terms and conditions discussed in group meetings and recorded in minutes

Utilisation of loans reviewed regularly in group meetings

Recovery of loans reviewed regularly in-group meetings.

2


2

 
2

 

2


2

Ascertain the position from group leaders/ members

Peruse  minutes book (Each item will get marks shown against it, if the conditions are satisfied)

11

INTEREST ON SHG LOANS

Uniform rate irrespective of source of funds

Different rates depending on source of funds

Interest rates vary according to the purpose of loan

Uniform interest rate for all purposes


5

 3

 
5

 
3

Peruse loan register.

Ascertain from group leaders / members

12

UTILISATION OF SAVING FOR LOANING

Above 80%

Above 50% and upto 80%

10

5

Compare savings outstanding on a given date with loans outstanding on the same date to obtain the percentage. Nil mark for utilisation of savings below 50%

13

RECOVERY OF LOANS

Dues not recovered in respect of 10% or less of total no.of loan accounts

Dues not recovered between 10% and 30% of total no.of loan accounts.

10

 

5

Even one instalment unpaid without authorisation by the group is treated as dues not recovered. Count such accounts and compare them with total no. Of loan a/c. Also, peruse minutes book for authorisation for non-payment

14

BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS

Attendance cum minutes book

Savings Register

Loan Ledger

 Bank Passbook

3

3

3

1

Each record / register, if maintained properly and upto date, will get marks shown against each.

15

BYLAWS / GROUP RULES

Known to all members

Known to most of the members

Not known to many members

10

5

0

Ascertain from the member through interaction

 

 

TOTAL MARKS

150

 

   
  SELECTION CRITERIA OF SHG FOR LINKAGE TO BANK LOAN
   
1. SHG scoring more than 120 marks out of maximum of 150 marks could be chosen for credit linkage
   
2. SHG scoring less than 120 marks will have to be further developed before linkage. The areas for taken up after 3 months.
   
 

Many desist from the use of the word leader

   
  go to top
   
 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
  Publications
  Circulars
  Micro Credit Innovation Department
© NABARD 2007 Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Feedback | Contact us | Sitemap
Site designed & developed by : Lintas Personal (SRS), 2007
Site maintained by : Web Werks India Pvt Ltd.