As per the guidelines of RBI/GOI, NABARD retains a margin of 0.5%
on cost basis
for administering RIDF. The differential interest, however, is credited to the
Tribal
Development Fund maintained by NABARD.
9. Period of Loan
The repayment period of 5 years including a 2 year grace period was provided under RIDF-I to RIDF-V. The repayment period has, however, been extended to 7 years including a grace period of 2 years since RIDF-VI and the same policy is continuing.
10. Normative Allocation
Corpus in Tranche is allocated among all States on the basis of norms prescribed by the PSC. Currently, the allocation norms provide weightage to rural population (25%), Geographical Area of the State (25%) and Infrastructural Development Index (25%)
and availement of sanction(5%) and disbursements(20%) in the past tranches.
Some of the State Governments are not able to fully utilise the allocation and the State-wise allocations are reviewed by PSC from time to time and accordingly reallocated.
11. Nodal Department for RIDF
The Finance Departments of the State Governments act as Nodal Departments for operationalising RIDF. The project proposals are routed through the Finance Department only and no proposals are accepted directly from any other Department of the State Government. All other related items of work like submission of drawals applications under sanctioned projects, Release of loan, execution of documents, repayment of loans, etc., are attended to by Finance Departments of the State Governments.
12. Appraisal of Projects
Regional Offices receive the detailed project reports from State Governments based on their priorities and within the priorities/activities
decided under RIDF. The detailed project reports are subject to field and desk appraisal by a team comprising of NABARD officers as well as consultants, who are normally senior retired officers of the concerned departments of State/Central Government.
13. Documentation
Besides normal documents such as acceptance of General and Special Terms & Conditions of sanction, Time Promissory Note (TPN), the State Government has to execute mandate with the RBI ( Central Accounts Section, Nagpur ) authorizing the latter to debit their current account and pay to NABARD in case of any default in payment of principal or repayment of
interests
on due date. The State Governments are required to furnish a certificate to the effect that the advances drawn are within the limits prescribed by the State Legislative Assembly under Article 293(1)
as also within the borrowing limit fixed by the Government of India under Article 293(3) of the Constitution of India.
14. Phasing of the Projects
The normal phasing ( Project implementation Period ) under RIDF-I was 2 years whereas under subsequent tranches of RIDF, it is 3 years. However, due to operational constraints, phasing has to be normally extended for the Tranche as a whole or for specific projects to enable the State Governments to complete the projects.
15. Release of Funds
Mobilisation advance / Start up advance @ 20% of the RIDF Loan
sanctioned under the projects
is released to the State Governments on conveying acceptance of the terms & conditions of sanction by the State Government, before incurring expenditure on the projects for procurement and supply of materials, etc.
Loans are released on reimbursement basis against the actual expenditure incurred in execution of sanctioned projects. RIDF loans are released to the State Governments by Regional Offices of NABARD.
16. Cost Escalation
It is expected that RIDF projects would be completed on time within the approved cost. Proposals for cost escalation are considered based on merits.
17. Monitoring of RIDF Projects
Monitoring of projects is basically the responsibility of the State Governments. Yet an effective monitoring mechanism developed by NABARD is one of the strong features of RIDF. Currently,
9000-10,000
projects which constitute about 9% of the ongoing projects are annually field monitored by Districts Development Managers, other officers of ROs and Consultants. Selective sector-wise monitoring is undertaken by the HO and through external agencies also.
18. Monitoring Committees
In addition to the field monitoring, institutional mechanism has been developed for sectoral and project-wise review at the level of Superintending Engineers, Chief Engineers, Head of the Departments, Administrative Secretaries & Chief Secretaries to facilitate timely completion of RIDF projects. The mechanism has stabilised and is working satisfactorily. NABARD also organizes capacity building workshops for the Govt. staff working in various line departments connected with RIDF projects. |